Jul 13, 2022
In Design Forum
Yanliao anti-nuclear self-rescue association , stated in the submission that according to the soil and water conservation bureau's "No. Po built a raw pool. Duan jinhao, the reviewer, believes that although there are many countermeasures for the forward slope, there is still a risk of safety in the long-term due to factors such as rainwater infiltration, rock weathering and earthquakes. Wu jiajun, the reviewer, mentioned that: he once wrote to the competent authority of the target business, emphasizing the hidden concerns of the downstream slope, but the reply he received seems to be back to the development unit (taipower company)... The raw water pool is built on the downstream slope, although it is planned to it is solved by engineering methods, but it becomes an occasional hidden worry, which is even more unfavorable for the overall safety of the nuclear unit. Even though there may be engineering technologies that can adapt to the slope and reduce risks, in the long run, considering many uncertain factors and the importance of nuclear power safety, most members still strongly suggest that it should be Illustrator Art Work constructed in different places. However, the ministry of economic affairs and taipower at that time, in order to carry out the decisive disposal measures smoothly, still passed them in situ with the cooperation of the soil and water conservation bureau. Can such categorical disposal measures be reassuring? Taking a step back, even though the water source and power supply system that has been resolutely disposed of can maintain operation with many backup supplies, most reports ignore crisis management. Is there sufficient information for judgment? Who has the right to decide whether to keep or abolish more than hundreds of billions of units?